Skip to main content

A Promising Pattern: Meta-Analysis Reveals Strong, Sustained Antidepressant Effects of Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression

In the meta-analysis Efficacy of single and repeated administration of ketamine in unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, researchers pooled data from 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the antidepressant potential of ketamine in patients with unipolar and bipolar depression. The results are both compelling and clinically significant: a single dose of ketamine produced rapid reductions in depressive symptoms, and repeated dosing helped sustain these improvements over several weeks.

This comprehensive synthesis of clinical evidence provides robust support for ketamine’s role in addressing treatment-resistant depression (TRD), offering new hope for patients who have failed to benefit from traditional antidepressant regimens.

Scope and Design of the Meta-Analysis

The researchers included 20 randomized controlled trials, each comparing either single or repeated ketamine administration to placebo or standard antidepressant therapy. The meta-analysis focused on outcomes in both unipolar and bipolar depression, particularly in treatment-resistant populations.

The authors examined time points ranging from 24 hours to several weeks after ketamine administration, comparing standardized mean differences (SMDs) in depression severity scores. This provided a comprehensive temporal profile of ketamine’s impact on depressive symptoms.

Rapid Response After a Single Dose

One of the most striking findings was the strong effect of a single ketamine dose in reducing depressive symptoms:

  • At 24 hours, ketamine outperformed placebo with an SMD of −0.89 (95% CI −1.24 to −0.53; p < 0.00001)
  • This effect was sustained for up to 7 days in most patients receiving adjunctive ketamine therapy

Notably, the antidepressant effect was strongest when ketamine was added to ongoing antidepressant treatment—suggesting a synergistic role rather than a complete monotherapy substitute.

Durability Through Repeated Dosing

For patients receiving multiple ketamine infusions, the meta-analysis found sustained benefit:

  • At 2–3 weeks, the reduction in depression scores remained significant, with SMDs ranging from −0.70 to −0.81, depending on dosing frequency
  • Patients who received serial ketamine infusions showed maintained symptom relief well beyond the initial dose window

These findings suggest that repeated ketamine administration helps extend and stabilize early gains, making it an attractive option for ongoing depression management in TRD.

Differential Effects by Dosing Strategy

The meta-analysis revealed important nuances based on how ketamine was administered:

  • Adjunctive therapy (with other antidepressants) resulted in the most durable outcomes
  • Monotherapy with ketamine showed a reduction in efficacy at the 7-day mark

This supports a clinical model where ketamine is used alongside first-line antidepressants, especially during the critical early phases of recovery.

Implications for Treatment-Resistant Depression

Implications for Treatment-Resistant DepressionThe strength of these results supports ketamine’s emerging role as a rapid-acting, adjunctive antidepressant in cases of TRD. Traditional antidepressants often take 4–6 weeks to demonstrate benefit—a timeframe many patients in crisis cannot afford. Ketamine, in contrast:

  • Begins working within hours to days
  • Can be repeated to sustain effects
  • May be layered onto existing regimens to amplify efficacy

These qualities make it uniquely valuable in acute settings and for individuals who have cycled through multiple treatment failures.

Limitations of the Meta-Analysis

As with all meta-analyses, this study is limited by heterogeneity in the original trials:

  • Differences in ketamine doses and frequencies
  • Varied use of adjunctive medications
  • Different depression rating scales used across studies

Nonetheless, the consistency of effect across multiple trials lends credibility to the findings.

Future Research Directions

The findings raise several key areas for future investigation:

  • What is the optimal dosing schedule to maintain ketamine’s antidepressant effects?
  • How does long-term safety vary across populations?
  • Can biomarkers predict who will benefit most from ketamine?
  • What are the comparative benefits of S-ketamine (esketamine) versus racemic ketamine in this context?

Conclusion

The study Efficacy of single and repeated administration of ketamine in unipolar and bipolar depression reinforces what individual trials have long suggested: ketamine produces rapid, reliable relief for patients with TRD, and its effects can be sustained through repeated use.

While further research is needed to refine protocols, this meta-analysis strongly supports ketamine’s clinical adoption as part of an evidence-based strategy to treat severe, refractory depression.

References

  1. Romeo B, Choucha W. Efficacy of single and repeated administration of ketamine in unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01514-2
  2. Coyle CM, Laws KR. The use of ketamine as an antidepressant: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2015;30(3):152–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.2462
  3. McIntyre RS, Rosenblat JD, Nemeroff CB, et al. Synthesizing the evidence for ketamine and esketamine in treatment-resistant depression: an international expert opinion. Am J Psychiatry. 2021;178(5):383–399. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20081251
  4. Fond G, Loundou A, Rabu C, et al. Ketamine administration in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology. 2014;231(18):3663–3676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3664-5
  5. Newport DJ, Carpenter LL, McDonald WM, et al. Ketamine and other NMDA antagonists: early clinical trials and possible mechanisms in depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(10):950–966. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15040465